|
No. |
Parameter |
Unit |
State of the art |
FCH 2 JU target
|
|||
|
SoA 2012 |
International SoA 2017* |
Target 2020 |
Target 2024 |
Target 2030 |
|||
|
1 |
Fuel cell system durability |
h |
2,500 |
4,000 |
5,000 |
6,000 |
7,000 |
|
2 |
Hydrogen consumption |
kg/100 km |
na |
1.2 |
1.15 |
1,1 |
1 |
|
3 |
Availability |
% |
95 |
98 |
98 |
99 |
>99 |
|
4 |
Maintenance |
EUR/km |
na |
0.04 |
0.03 |
0.02 |
0.01 |
|
5 |
Fuel cell system cost |
EUR/kW |
500 |
100 |
60 |
50 |
40 |
|
6 |
Areal power density |
W/cm2 |
na |
1.0 |
1.5 |
1.8 |
2.0 |
|
7 |
PGM loading |
g/kW |
na |
0.4 |
0.17 |
0.08 |
0.05 |
|
8 |
Cell Volumetric power |
kW/l |
na |
5.0 |
7.3 |
9.3 |
10.0 |
Notes:
1. Durability of the fuel cell system until 10% power degradation. The typical vehicle lifetime requirement is 6,000-7,000 h of operation.
2. Hydrogen consumption for 100 km driven under real life operation using exclusively hydrogen feed.
3. Percent of time that the vehicle is able to operate versus the overall time that it is intended to operate, assuming only FC related technical issues.
4. Costs for spare parts and labour for the drivetrain maintenance per km traveled over the vehicle's complete lifetime of 6,000 to 7,000 hours.
5. Actual cost of the fuel cell system - excluding overheads and profits, assuming 100,000 systems/year as cost calculation basis.
6. Power per cell area @ 0.66V: Ratio of the operating power of the fuel cell to the active surface area of the fuel cell.
7. Overall loading in Platinum Group Metals at cathode + anode. (to be only used as guidance, not as a development target).
8. Power for single cell (cathode plate, MEA, anode plate) per unit volume, ref: Autostack-core Evo 2 dimensions: cell pitch 1.0 mm and cell area: 595 cm2
*for cost aspects, when relevant, the European SoA is indicated and labelled with an asterisk

